The First Zoo

Where and when was the first zoo?  Of course, depending on your definition of the word "zoo," different people might have different answers to this question.  The oldest known zoological collection has been excavated at Hierakanopolis in Egypt, dating to around 3500 B.C.  So far, the remains of numerous animals have been uncovered there.  According to one source, 112 different animals have been found, including elephants, wildcats, hippos, cows, hartebeest, baboons, dogs, and an Aurochs, the subject of an Animal Spotlight awhile back!  (Click HERE to check it out!)  Since my source is a few years out of date, it is entirely possible that more discoveries have been made there since then!  Despite all of this, most scientists don't believe this is the first "zoo," at least not by modern definitions, a place where anyone can come and look at these animals.  It is thought that the site at Hierakanopolis is more of a private collection kind of thing.

Most people seem to agree that the first public zoo was created by Queen Hatshepsut, a zoo that people today would define as a zoo.  Not a lot of data (at least not that I can find) exists to tell us what sort of animals Hatshepsut kept in her zoo.  Some of the animals that we do know were imported include rhinos, cattle, giraffes, leopards, monkeys, and hounds.  Presumably, some of the other animals that we mentioned before made it into the zoo, as well.

What other animals could have made it into the zoo?  A lot of this is speculation on my part, but based on the animals of the surrounding area, here are some animals that I think likely made it into these zoos:

• Dromedary camels
• Jackals
• Hyenas
• Crocodiles
• Cheetahs
• Lions
• Jungle cats

There are many reports of other important Ancient Egyptians possessing captive lions, and it seems like captive lions would be a pretty impressive display of one's power.  I find it very likely that both cheetahs and jungle cats were members of the zoos, as well, as cheetahs (generally fairly docile around humans, especially compared to other large African cats like lions and leopards) have been domesticated a number of times throughout history.  These domestic cheetahs were used by many people, including Akbar the Great of India (who was thought to have around 9,000 cheetahs: not to be confused with Admiral Ackbar), for hunting, both for sport and for sustenance.  Jungle cats, too are reported to have been domesticated by the Ancient Egyptians in order to hunt water birds.  Mummified remains of the jungle cat are sometimes found in ancient tombs, put there by the burial people.  (I don't actually know if they have a special name or something).  

This was the birthday post of Grace Albers! Happy birthday, Grace! If you have a birthday coming up, just email me the date at cuyvaldar123946@gmail.com with the date and your favorite animals, and I will do my best to get a post in! And if you like what you are reading, please feel free to follow us here or via Facebook!

Luxor on Dwellable

Animal of the Day: Addax

The Addax (Addax nasomaculatus) sometime called the screwhorn antelope, is a "Critically Endangered" member of the group of animals known collectively as the antelope.  The addax is found in the Sahara desert.  The Addax has been extirpated, or made regionally extinct, in the countries of Egypt, Algeria, Western Sahara, and Sudan.  Nowadays, the Addax can only be naturally found in the countries of Chad,  Niger, Mauritania, and has been reintroduced into Morocco and Tunisia.  The Addax has earned its "Critically Endangered" status due to the immense and very frequent hunting of its horns, and is still often hunted on game reserves in the United States.  The meat and leather obtained from the Addax are also highly prized.  Their diet consists of primarily grass, as well as the leaves of various shrubs.  Rarely drinking, they instead gain most of their moisture through the plants that they eat.  The Addax is a slow moving animal, leaving it vulnerable to attacks from cheetahs, leopards, lions, African wild dogs, and humans.  The calves can also be killed by servals, caracals and hyenas.

There is also a Spanish motorsport team named the Barwa Addax Team, but I was unable to ascertain whether this team was named after the animal or not!
 

Top Ten: Extinct Sea Monsters (Part 1 of 5)

Since ya'll kinda get gypped on Wednesdays with the "What Is It?" challenge, I decided that, when I do do the challenge, I will also include a "Top Ten" list.  I mean, come on now, who doesn't like lists?  I know some of my friends would be absolutely and completely lost without them!  So for today's "Top Ten," we are going to take a look at some of the world's most amazing, extinct sea monsters.  This is also up for debate, so if you disagree, just give me a holler!  Also, they are not in any particular order, I just kind of threw them all in there!  So without further ado, here we go, with our "Top Ten:  Extinct Sea Monsters!"

1.  Megalodon - This gigantic relative of the extant great white shark was thought to be simply massive: perhaps even sixty feet in length!  Living the world over, Megalodon stalked the seas during the Miocene and Pliocene Epochs, and only died out during the current Pleistocene Epoch, around two million years ago.  It is thought that Megalodon evolved to such gigantic proportions in order to be able to attack the massive whales that had started to evolve in the cooler seas of the Miocene and Pliocene.  Remember now: if it's a shark, then it's a fish!

A tooth fragment from Megalodon at this excellent restaurant called The Crab Shack on Tybee Island off of the coast of Savannah, Georgia. 

2.  Basilosaurus - A massive, predatory whale (and, therefore, a mammal) that cruised the seas in the Late Eocene Epoch, 40 to 34 MYA, fossil discoveries of this massive animal were reportedly so common in the southern United States during the early 19th century, that bones of Basilosaurus would be used as furniture!  It was first discovered in Louisiana, and is the state fossil of both Mississippi and Alabama.  Basilosaurus has also been found in Egypt and Pakistan.  At around sixty feet in length, the same estimated length of Megalodon, Basilosaurus is thought to have been the biggest creature alive at the time.

COMING UP:

3.  Liopleurodon
4.  Shonisaurus
5. Elasmosaurus
6.  Dunkleosteus
7.  Archelon
8.  Leedsichthys
9.  Tanystropheus
10. Tylosaurus

This post is part of the "Top Ten: Extinct Sea Monsters" series.  For the rest of the posts in this series, click HERE. 

The Biggest Carnivorous Dinosaur Part 3: Spinosaurus, The World's Largest Penguin

Spinosaurus quickly smashed its way to the top (literally!) following the success of Jurassic Park III.  At up to 56 feet (17 meters) in length, Spinosaurus (found in Egypt and Morocco) is unquestionably the longest carnivorous dinosaur that has ever been discovered, and by a significant margin, too.  But how could Spinosaurus be so successful when another carnivorous monstrosity, Carcharodontosaurus, lived in such close proximity?  The answer lies in what it ate; in fact, Spinosaurus appears not to have been as carnivorous as we once thought, and seems to in fact have been more piscivorous.  Essentially, it is thought that Spinosaurus might have survived on a diet consisting a great deal upon fish.

There is a great wealth of information that indicates the staple diet of Spinosaurus was fish.  Here we will take a more in-depth look at this evidence.

A picture of Spinosaurus drawn by the talented young artist Sam Lippincott.

1.  POSITION OF THE NOSTRILS:  Spinosaurus, unlike most other theropod (meat-eating) dinosaurs had nostrils situated very high up on its skull.  By contrast, most other theropods, like Tyrannosaurus, had nostrils very close to the front of the skull.  The nostril placement in Spinosaurus would have allowed it to stick its nose into the water quite deep, enabling it to hunt fish more effectively.

2.  SENSORY ORGANS ON THE TIP OF THE SNOUT:  Along with the high placement of the nostrils, Spinosaurus also had a number of small sensory organs at the front of the snout, revealed by CT scans.  These greatly resemble those of the crocodile, who uses them to sense where prey is by "seeing" tiny movements in the water.  Thus, a crocodile can attack its prey without ever seeing them with their eyes.  Spinosaurus appears to have been able to do much the same thing, making its hunting method of choice quite obviously effective, given its immense size.

3.  ISOTOPIC EVIDENCE:  A study of the isotopes in the skull of a Spinosaurus specimen revealed something quite interesting.  Spinosaurus shares a great deal of isotopic overlap with crocodiles, fairly aquatic animals.  By contrast, other carnivorous dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus have very different isotopic readings, indicating a terrestrial lifestyle.  Given the great deal of overlap possessed by Spinosaurus and crocodiles, it appears that Spinosaurus spent much of its life like a crocodile; semi-submerged in rivers and streams.

4.  THE TEETH TELL THE TALE:  Spinosaurus, unlike most other carnivorous dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus, Allosaurus, or the famous Velociraptor, possess conical, round teeth.  These other carnivores possess thin, blade-like teeth, made for slicing, crushing or tearing into other animals.  Spinosaurus has teeth much like a crocodile; round and conical.  These teeth are made for gripping and making sure that an animal does not escape. 

5.  THE TEETH TELL THE TALE....AGAIN:  Yet again, we come to the issue of teeth, and this is one of the most damning pieces of evidence of all.  During the time that Spinosaurus lived in North Africa, another inhabitant of these streams and rivers was a saw-toothed fish called Onchopristis.  Two fossils involving Onchopristis have been discovered in conjunction with the remains of Spinosaurus.  One was the skull of a Spinosaurus; imbedded in one of the tooth sockets was a vertebrae from an Onchopristis.  The other discovery was the barb of an Onchopristis embedded in the jaw of the Spinosaurus.

6.  PLUS:  We only ever seem to find Spinosaurus in shallow aquatic environments, where fishy prey would be abundant.

All in all, it seems like an inevitable conclusion to draw that Spinosaurus was, in fact, a piscivore, at least much of the time.  A fascinating example of the crazy turns evolution can take.

The Biggest Carnivorous Dinosaur Part 2: Carcharodontosaurus Vs. Spinosaurus

As I promised yesterday, today we are going to take a closer look at Carcharodontosaurus (kar-kar-o-DON-to-SAUR-us).  Carcharodontosaurus was a relative of Colorado's own Allosaurus.  However, Carcharodontosaurus was four times larger, and found in Egypt, Morocco, Algeria, Libya, and Niger.  At around 46 feet long, Carcharodontosaurus was similar in size to yesterday's Giganotosaurus (pronounced jig-a-NOTE-o-saur-us), and longer than Tyrannosaurus, though Tyrannosaurus was undoubtedly much bulkier.  Regardless, Carcharodontosaurus was a monster-sized killer, and almost certainly had a monster-sized appetite to match.  It is almost a certainty that such an animal would have a fairly large territory, and would have needed to eat a great deal to maintain its fast metabolism, similar to your average teenage dude.

Clearly, such a large predator had little competition from other carnivorous dinosaurs.  Or did it?  As a matter of fact, 95 MYA, North Africa was home to not one, but two monster-sized killers, Carcharodontosaurus, and the even longer, 50 foot (15 meter) Spinosaurus.  (Some not so conservative estimates even place the maximum size for Spinosaurus as 60 feet (18 meters) in length, but this does seem extreme.)

Now, in the modern day, predators can inhabit the same area.  Take the plains of Africa, for example; in many places, lions, leopards, cheetahs, wild dogs and hyenas all inhabit the same area.  There is a clear hierarchy amongst the animals, and each seems to get enough to eat.  However, this is partly because each animal exploits a slightly different set of resources, so contact amongst them is less frequent than if all five of the large carnivores all hunted the same animal, say, the Thomson's Gazelle.  This is a phenomenon known as resource partitioning, and it occurs all over the place in nature, arguably one of the most important factors involving ecology and evolution. Scientists believe that a similar sort of partitioning took place between the two mega-carnivores of Mid-Cretaceous North Africa, with Carcharodontosaurus being a terrestrial carnivore, while Spinosaurus took to the water.  We will conclude "The Biggest Carnivorous Dinosaur" trilogy tomorrow with a look at the environment Spinosaurus was able to so successfully exploit.

A fantastic visual representation of resource partitioning amongst large herbivorous mammals in Africa.  The giraffe, the zebra, and the wildebeest will all inhabit the same area and eat plants, but the types of plants can differ.  Photo Credit: Ted and Gail Neher